Introduction Baseline 1980

CHANGES 1980 TO 1990 By 1990 Texas remained the state where the poorest county (Starr) had an INDEX that was lowest compared the most affluent county (Collin), and Rhode Island remained at the other end of the continuum (Figure 20). In Texas the percentage dropped dramatically with the level of INDEX in the poorest county, expressed as a percentage of that in the most affluent county, of only 13.39%. In Rhode Island the change was less dramatic with the percentage dropping somewhat to 75.30. Of the 10 states with the lowest INDEX compared to the most affluent county in 1980, 7 states remained in this group by 1990, namely Texas, New Mexico, Kentucky, Mississippi, Virginia, Louisiana, and Colorado. Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama exited this bottom 10, to be replaced by South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Arizona. The other end of the spectrum continued to be dominated by states in New England The percentage gap remained highest in New Mexico where it increased significantly to 274.85 (Figure 21). As was the case in Texas, in New Mexico the poorest county percentage compared to the most affluent county dropped precipitously from 23.75 to 13.9 (Table 10). Rhode Island also remained the state with the lowest percentage gap at 26.58. Looking at the change in percentage gap from 1980 to 1990 New Mexico represents the most extreme increase, followed by New York, Texas, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Alabama, Wisconsin, Mississippi, and Montana (Figure 22). Only 11 states had a reduction in the percentage gap during the 1980s which is an indication of some convergence between the rich and poor counties. These states were Nebraska, Maryland, Arkansas, Iowa, Massachusetts, Maine, Nevada, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Washington, and West Virginia. The magnitude of this reduction in the percentage gap is smaller than the increasing percentage gap in other states, varying between 20.61 in Nebraska and 0.06 in West Virginia. Thus it seems that in general, the geographic expression of inequality grew during the 1980s. Figure 20. State Poorest County INDEX as a Percent of the Most Affluent County INDEX by State, 1990, Figure 21. Poorest and Most Affluent County Percentage Gap Compared to State Average, 1990 Figure 22. Change in Percentage Gap Between Poorest and Most Affluent Counties Compared to State Average, 1980-90

1990-2000 2000-2010 Entire Study Period 1980-2010