Modeling and Control Design for a Single-Link Flexible Robot
Figure 1: A single-link flexible robot.
Goal
To compare various modeling approaches for flexible robots and assess the ease or difficulty of using those approaches for the design of real-time feedback control systems for motion control and vibration suppression
Background
Figure 1 shows a single-link flexible robot. The robot is made up of a DC motor driving a cantilever beam (this system is sometimes referred to as a slewing beam). The input to the system is a voltage to the motor. The outputs include a quadrature encoder signal giving the position of the motor , an angular velocity sensor measuring , and a strain gage measuring the vibration of the beam.
There are several approaches to modeling this system that have been presented in the literature:
-
Fully nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA)
-
An FEA approach focused on correcting for geometric foreshortening [1]
-
The transfer matrix method (TMM)
Approach
Each of the modeling approaches mentioned above has strengths and
weaknesses, often trading off computational difficulty with theoretical
accuracy. This project will compare these different modeling approaches
with one another and discuss differences in simulation results. The
project will then move on to investigating the feasibility of using
each model in feedback control design. One goal of the project will be
to run some form of the simulations in real-time on embedded hardware
in order to estimate unmeasurable states and simulate additional sensor
locations. The control systems will be implemented on PSoC's
(Programmable System-on-Chip) and/or PIC chips.
Bibliography
- [1]
-
Banerjee, A. K. and Dickens, J. M., "Dynamics of an Arbitrary Flexible Body in Large Rotation and Translation," Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Vol. 13, No. 2, MAR-APR 1990, pp. 221 - 227.
- [2]
-
Segalman, D. J. and Dohrmann, C. R., "A method for calculating the dynamics of rotating flexible structures," Journal of Vibration and Acoustics-Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 118, No. 3, JUL 1996, pp. 313 - 322.