banner
toolbar
Click Here for WSJ.com
March 25, 1999

Europe Sees a Boom in Mergers and Acquisitions


Related Articles
  • Issue in Depth: The Euro and the New Europe

    Forum

  • Join a Discussion on Merger Mania
    By EDMUND L. ANDREWS

    PARIS -- It looks, some say, like a European replay of the 1980s on Wall Street: hostile takeovers, poison pills, white knights and an endless stream of high-priced investment bankers pitching new deals.

    Certainly, Europe has never seen anything quite like it. LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton is trying to buy Gucci Group of Italy. Gucci is seeking refuge by teaming up with yet another French raider, Francois Pinault.

    Meanwhile, Olivetti, an Italian computer and communications equipment maker, is making a hostile bid for Italy's biggest phone company. And France's largest banks are in a three-way takeover brawl that has amazed both the country's financial elite and the French government.

    For all the adventurism, though, something big is missing. Despite the talk of an integrating Europe driven to get together by its new single currency, very few deals so far involve cross-border transactions between European companies.

    Instead, many of the mergers seem intended at keeping foreigners -- especially other Europeans -- at bay. Indeed, many such deals are explicitly promoted on nationalistic grounds.

    When Banque Nationale de Paris announced a surprise bid to take over its two main rivals, its chairman noted that "there are three main banks in France and they should remain in French hands." In Italy, the head of Olivetti appealed to the same sentiments in justifying his $58 billion hostile bid for the national telephone company.

    "You still have a tendency of viewing banks or industrial corporations as national treasures," said Herbert Aspbury, head of client management at Chase Manhattan in Europe. "This is probably the first step or a necessary consolidation process, but I don't think the second step of cross-border mergers will happen quickly."

    Indeed, Europe's biggest cross-border deals have been with American companies. Daimler-Benz took over Chrysler Corp. Deutsche Bank is acquiring Bankers Trust. Koninklijke Ahold, a big Dutch supermarket company, bought Giant Food in the Washington-Baltimore area.

    Within Europe itself, national deals have been the rule. Banque Nationale de Paris shocked the French establishment two weeks ago by launching a hostile takeover attempt against Banque Paribas and Societe Generale, just a month after those two announced their own plans to merge.

    The French battle follows major bank mergers in Switzerland, Spain and Germany. Indeed, Switzerland's two largest banks, UBS and Swiss Bank Corp., set the pace a year ago by forming the world's biggest bank.

    The pattern has continued. Just last Sunday, Italy's four biggest banks announced plans for two separate takeovers worth about $26 billion in all.

    Nationalism prevails as well in fields like car manufacturing. The French government has made it clear it would almost certainly block any attempt to buy Renault, in which it still owns 44 percent of the shares. But it is willing to allow Renault to buy a 35 percent share of Japan's Nissan Motor. Fiat of Italy is out of reach, because the Agnelli family retains firm control through a convoluted network of affiliated companies.

    Mergers have run aground even in the defense industry, where European governments badly want their national aerospace companies to unite in a single powerful enterprise. Those plans have been derailed by deep disagreements among British, French and German companies.

    The exceptions seem to prove the rule, too. In what would be one of Europe's biggest cross-border deals, Hoechst AG of Germany and Rhone-Poulenc of France announced plans in December to merge their pharmaceutical businesses. But that deal is on shaky ground, in part because the two companies worked so hard to be politically correct.

    Not only did Hoechst and Rhone-Poulenc agree to pool their shares in a "merger of equals," they also agreed to build a new headquarters in Strasbourg, as close to the border between France and Germany as it is possible to get.

    That was all well and good. The problem was that most experts believe Hoechst is worth more than Rhone-Poulenc. That generated complaints from Hoechst's biggest shareholder, Kuwait Petroleum Corp., which is worried about being short-changed and has still not given its approval.

    To be sure, the merger frenzy does signal a revolution in European business practices. The clubby corporate networks, in which banks and conglomerates hold each other's stocks, are breaking down. Companies that once relied on their local bank to raise money are now turning to global stock and bond markets. As a result, European executives are more exposed to unwanted takeovers if their companies' shares sink.

    But the upshot is a jarring blend of new-age buccaneering and more old-fashioned national protectionism.

    The tension between these impulses is particularly vivid in European banking, which has always been a politically sensitive industry.

    The most recent such evidence came this weekend, when four of Italy's biggest banks announced two separate mergers. Unicredito Italiano, itself the product of a smaller merger two years ago, said it would acquire Banca Commerciale Italiana for $16 billion in stock. San Paulo-IMI, Italy's biggest banking group, said it would buy Banca di Roma for $9.7 billion in stock.

    But the biggest brawl is here in Paris, where bankers and political leaders had become increasingly alarmed by the merger mania under way from Switzerland to Spain.

    At a black-tie dinner hosted by France's top bank executives last December, France's finance minister warned the bankers they were in danger of being left behind.

    "Too often in the past, infighting in France has prevailed against preparation for the future," said Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the finance minister. "Today, the following question is posed: How do you -- how do we -- wish to manage these indispensable reforms?"

    The message was clear: The banks had to pull together or risk being brushed aside. Indeed, the three biggest had already been sounding each other out for more than a year. Michel Pebereau, chairman of Banque Nationale de Paris, known universally by its initials BNP, had fruitlessly courted Societe Generale. Banque Paribas, which focuses on investment and corporate banking, had repeatedly insisted that it did not want to merge with an ordinary commercial bank.

    "In France, we were very late in restructuring our banking industry," said Laurent Treca, a board member of BNP. "Many of the things taking place here had already occurred elsewhere in Europe -- in Italy, in Spain, in Belgium. But in France, there were no major moves on French banks."

    Meanwhile, the government was desperately trying to privatize the deeply troubled state-owned bank, Credit Lyonnais. Having bailed out the government-owned bank from billions of francs worth of bad loans in everything from French real estate to a Hollywood studio, officials were (and still are) trying to sell off the sanitized institution and its new management.

    But the French government made it clear it did not want its big banks in foreign hands. Bidding rules for Credit Lyonnais blocked any institution from acquiring more than 10 percent, and industry executives argue that French regulators would have simply blocked foreigners from taking over one of the three big healthy banks.

    Foreign rivals were certainly interested. Rolf-Ernst Breuer, chairman of Deutsche Bank AG in Frankfort, repeatedly told analysts and investors that he wanted to form an alliance with a French bank. He even proposed buying a significant stake in Credit Lyonnais.

    Though French regulators never explicitly blocked Deutsche Bank, Breuer concluded that he could never make an acceptable deal. Last month, he announced that Deutsche Bank would simply build its own skeleton structure of 10 bank branches in France.

    But French banks were also under pressure from one of France's most influential financial figures, Claude Bebear, chairman of the French insurance conglomerate AXA. AXA holds about 6 percent of BNP's shares and 7 percent of Paribas'. AXA executives sit on both boards.

    Bebear, who had built AXA into a global giant by acquiring companies as varied as Equitable Group in the United States and Union Assurances de Paris, had been chafing for a merger for a long time.

    "What he thinks is that French banks are too small and not profitable enough," said Christophe Dufraux, a spokesman for AXA. "If French banks want to be among the top players -- the way we did it in insurance -- they needed to change."

    Industry experts say Bebear shook things up last October, when he publicly criticized Banque Paribas for failing to convince investors of the wisdom of its strategy. Though the comments were measured, French banking executives immediately interpreted them as a wake-up call for Paribas.

    Andre Levy-Lang, chairman of Paribas, continued to insist throughout last fall that he still did not want to merge with a retail bank. But he apparently changed his views in private, and opened up talks with Societe Generale.

    When Paribas and Societe Generale announced their plan in early February for a $16 billion merger, French government officials were ecstatic. Strauss-Kahn called the merger "a direct response" to his wishes and said it would lead to "a strong and dynamic French financial sector."

    Pebereau said very little, but hired Goldman, Sachs & Co. as his investment banker to map out a response. He got some help from investors, who disliked the proposed merger and pushed down the value of both Paribas and Societe Generale in the stock market.

    On March 9, BNP announced an unsolicited tender offer for all the stock in both of its rivals. Pebereau, whose move stunned government officials, was also quick to wave the French tricolor.

    "Our country is capable of dominating this sector on a global scale," he said. "Through this alliance, we do not risk losing personality and culture."

    Bebear of AXA publicly sided with Banque Nationale de Paris last week. But analysts say it is far from clear that BNP will prevail. The offer must still clear several hurdles with French regulators, and the target banks may well fire back with a higher offer of their own.

    Regardless of who wins, the deeper question is whether France and indeed other European countries become more open to cross-border mergers.

    Breuer, of Deutsche Bank, politely announced in Frankfurt last week that he would stay out of the fight unless he was invited in.

    "What is happening in front of our eyes in France right now is very French," he said at a news conference to discuss his own company's results last week. "The nature of the process does not allow a foreign bank to get involved."



  • Click Here for WSJ.com

    Home | Site Index | Site Search | Forums | Archives | Marketplace

    Quick News | Page One Plus | International | National/N.Y. | Business | Technology | Science | Sports | Weather | Editorial | Op-Ed | Arts | Automobiles | Books | Diversions | Job Market | Real Estate | Travel

    Help/Feedback | Classifieds | Services | New York Today

    Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company