Phil 326: Philosophy and Film (Vailati)

Second paper topic

The paper topic is up to you. The only requirement is that it must involve 1 of the movies you watched for the course and have a different topic from your first paper.

Here are two examples of an appropriate topic:

1. Analyze High Noon in terms of the notion of integrity.

2. Analyze Crimes and Misdemeanors in light of the question of why we should be moral.

Repeating what I say in the online analyses of movies is not acceptable.  

A successful paper must:

• provide a reasoned, one to two pages (maximum) long summary of the movie.
• analyze the movie in the light of the readings. This requires making reference to specific episodes in the movie and to specific ideas in the readings by way of page references.
• refer, when appropriate, to other movies in the course.

A detailed analysis of a scene especially relevant to your interpretation is welcome but not required. For an example of a detailed analysis, you may look at the one provided for The Seventh Seal.

Suggestions:

• In general, a good paper cannot be written without watching the movie more than once.  Most of the movies are available in the library; unfortunately, they must be viewed in the library (no borrowing).  The US movies are often rather widely available for rental. However, it may be a good idea to borrow or buy the movies you are writing your papers on.
• My on-line analyses of the movies should give you some sense of what I'm looking for. Of course, your papers should be more detailed than my on-line accounts.
• You are encouraged to give me rough drafts of your paper. Keep in mind that I can return them with significant comments only if: i) it is given to me at least one week before the papers are due; ii) it is written reasonably clearly. Rough drafts consisting only of disjointed paragraphs or, worse, mere paragraph headings cannot be properly evaluated. You may turn in your rough draft as many times as you like, compatibly with the above requirements. My reading a student's rough draft of a paper does not entail that the paper, even if my comments are considered, will get a "B" or an "A." Often a paper must be revised more than once to become good.

For length and due dates see the sylllabus.